Urgent Action: Call Upon the Guatemalan Government to Ensure an End to Threats and Intimidation Affecting the Mack Case


From: Matthew Bray <Braym@lchr.org>

August 27, 2002

CALL UPON THE GUATEMALAN GOVERNMENT TO ENSURE AN

END TO THREATS AND INTIMIDATION AFFECTING THE MACK CASE    

Three military officers charged with orchestrating the September 11, 1990 murder of a renowned Guatemalan anthropologist may finally face justice, nearly twelve years after the murder. A trial date for General Edgar Augosto Godoy Gaitán, Colonel Juan Valencia Osorio and Colonel Juan Guillermo Olivia Carrera has been scheduled for September 3, 2002 in Guatemala City.

Myrna Mack was assassinated on September 11, 1990, in Guatemala City. She had been stalked for two weeks prior to her death by a military death squad, who targeted her in retaliation for her pioneering field work on the destruction of rural indigenous communities resulting from military counterinsurgency tactics in Guatemala's civil war.  Since the murder, Helen Mack, with the Lawyers Committee's support, has tirelessly fought to bring her sister's killers to justice. In 1993, a low-ranking military intelligence official was convicted for carrying out the murder, but his superiors have thus far evaded justice.

Attacks, intimidation and threats against those associated with the case have characterized the Mack case from the outset.  A police officer involved in the initial investigation was himself murdered, judges and witnesses have been forced into exile and members of the Mack family and their representatives have been subjected to a variety of threats.  Such acts of intimidation remain a constant obstacle to those in Guatemala seeking justice for human rights violations.

The Lawyers Committee was extremely disturbed to learn of further threats and intimidation directed against judges and a lawyer working on the case, late last week.  Reports indicate that there may have been attempts to interfere with the decision-making of the Constitutional Court, as it convened to consider one or more motions filed by the defense, including Amparo No. 1190-2002.  This amparo motion is crucial to the proceedings as it concerns the admissibility of several documents central to the case being put forward by the complainant, Helen Mack. It is also likely that the Court's decision on this matter will have significant bearing on other pending or future prosecutions of criminal human rights abuses.    

In addition, Mack Foundation attorney Licenciado Roberto Romero received threats by telephone and his home was attacked on August 23. This attack was carried out despite a protective measures order from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on Lic. Romero's behalf. Moreover, it is our understanding that there was in place an agreement with the Guatemalan police that Lic. Romero's house, along with two other locations, would be protected.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

The Lawyers Committee has written to the Guatemalan authorities, reminding them of their obligations to ensure respect for human rights, and, in particular, to ensure the administration of justice in an atmosphere free from fear and intimidation.  You can find the text of our letter, along with more background information on the Mack case, on our web-site, at www.lchr.org/defender .

Please write to the President, Minister of Interior, and President of the Constitutional Court in Guatemala, expressing your concern about these recent developments in the Mack case.  We have provided a model letter below, and encourage you to fax this, or similar text, to the Guatemalan authorities, with copies to your diplomatic representatives in Guatemala.  For US citizens, this representative is: 

Mr. Stephen McFarland
Chargé d'affaires
Embassy of the United States of America
Avenida Reforma 7-01, Zona 10
Guatemala City, Guatemala
Fax: 011 502 334 8477

Should you require more information, please contact Lorna Davidson (212 845 5251, <mailto:Davidsonl@lchr.org>Davidsonl@lchr.org) or Matthew Bray (212 845 5298, Braym@lchr.org.

* * * * * * *

Lic. Alfonso Portillo Cabrera
President of the Republic of Guatemala
6a. Avenida 'A' 4-41, Zona 1
Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala
Fax: 011 502 253 0540
       011 502 238 3579

Lic. Adolfo Reyes Calderon
Ministro de Gobernación
Ministerio de Gobernación
6a. Avenida 4-64, Zona 4
Ciudad de Guatemala
Guatemala
Fax: 011 502 362 0237/9

Pres. Lic. Nery Saul Dighero Herrera
Presidente
Corte Constitucionalidad
11 Ave. 9-37, Zone 1
Cuidad de Guatemala, Guatemala
Fax: 011 502 251 8215


Dear Sirs,

I would like to bring your attention to the case of Myrna Mack, the Guatemalan anthropologist murdered in 1990.  The trial of the former army officers accused of ordering this murder highlights the triple challenge Guatemala has faced in promoting international standards of due process, in ensuring judicial integrity and autonomy in a highly intimidating atmosphere, and in ensuring that no one is immune to prosecution for serious human rights crimes.

As you are aware, nearly nine years ago Guatemala's Supreme Court declared that the original trial of Noel de Jesus Beteta for the murder sufficiently established that superior officers shared responsibility with Beteta, and ordered that the proceedings continue to identify and try those additionally responsible. Although that has not yet occurred, in accordance with a judicial order issued in 1999 General Edgar Augosto Godoy Gaitán, Colonel Juan Valencia Osorio and Colonel Juan Guillermo Olivia Carrera are scheduled to stand trial on September 3, 2002, for their alleged roles in the murder.

The delays and obstacles which have vastly complicated efforts to finally bring this case to trial are a disturbing reflection of the intimidation and violence confronting Guatemalan judges-in particular in cases which concern individuals backed by powerful institutions and interests.   The progress that has been achieved in this important case is powerful testimony to the courage and conviction of the courts which have endeavored to review the evidence and determine legal responsibility. However, as you are well aware, this has come at an extraordinary cost:  the dozens of instances in which judges felt compelled to withdraw from a case, to delay decisions, to misinterpret Guatemalan law, and to flout international standards in the face of the threats and violence. This violence has already cost the lives or livelihoods of police investigators, witnesses, and other jurists connected to this case.   That fear - which is real and justified - is still at play, and threatens to irreparably obstruct the process as it nears this crucial juncture.

I am extremely disturbed to have received reports that there may have been attempts to interfere with the decision-making of the Constitutional Court, as it convened to consider one or more motions filed by the defense, including Amparo No. 1190-2002. This amparo motion is crucial to the proceedings as it concerns the admissibility of several documents central to the case being put forward by the complainant, Helen Mack. It is also likely that the Court's decision on this matter will have significant bearing on other pending or future prosecutions of criminal human rights abuses.  My concern about possible pressure on the Court is heightened by recent threats against one of the lawyers working on this case.  It is reported that Mack Foundation attorney Licenciado Roberto Romero received threats by telephone and his home was attacked on August 23. This attack was carried out despite a protective measures order from the Inter-American Court on Lic. Romero's behalf and an agreement that his home would be protected by the police.

As you know, it is the obligation of the state to respect and ensure respect for basic human rights in Guatemala.  The American Convention on Human Rights, to which Guatemala is a party, requires states to ensure that the judiciary is able to act independently and impartially, so that all persons can exercise their right to judicial protection (Article 25) and persons accused of committing a crime receive a fair trial (Article 8).  Despite this obligation, attacks upon and threats against members of the judiciary have been a serious and ongoing problem in Guatemala, in particular affecting cases involving investigation and prosecution for gross human rights violations by state agents.  In this regard, I refer you to the report of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Mr. Param Coomaraswamy, upon his mission to Guatemala in 1999 (E/CN.4/2000/61/Add.1, 6 January 2000).  At that time, the Special Rapporteur found allegations of threats, harassment and intimidation of Guatemalan judges to be well-founded and cause for serious concern.

I therefore call upon you to investigate any reports of judicial intimidation and to take measures to ensure that such intimidation is prevented in the future so that judges are not subjected to improper attempts to interfere with their deliberations. In particular, I urge the government to take steps to ensure that the courts will be able to consider all amparos presented relating to this case, including Amparo No. 1190-2002, fairly and without interference, taking into account all of the arguments put forward by the parties and the relevant domestic and international norms.

With regard to the threats against and attack upon Lic. Romero, I trust that you will take immediate measures to ensure his safety and the safety of his family.  In compliance with the order of the Inter-American Court, Lic. Romero and other representatives of the Mack Foundation must receive adequate protection and any attacks or threats made against them must be investigated thoroughly and the perpetrators brought to account.

Thank you for your consideration of this important matter.



Sincerely,

 
Back to Top of Page