Home |        FHRG Member Area       | FHRG Editorials    |     Newsletters     |     REMHI
Cases against impunity     |   Public Events |        |Join Our Mailing List       |       Other Web Sites |      Who Are We?  ]

REMHI MENU
Introduction
   | REMHI Chicago Project - 2002   | Proyecto REMHI Chicago - 2002    |

 

From: REMHI, OBISPADO SAN MARCOS

Subject: COMUNICADO POR AMENAZAS EN CONTRA DE PERSONAL DE LA DIOCESIS
DE SAN MARCOS
Date: 03 Jul 2003 16:03:57 -0600
La diócesis de San Marcos a jugado un papel muy importante en el apoyo a
la construcción de una sociedad más justa y humana, dentro del
compromiso asumido por la diócesis esta el acompañamiento a grupos que
buscan el pago de prestaciones laborales cuando han sido victimas de
despidos injustos, o cuando a trascurrido un tiempo largo de labores sin
haber recibido el salario correspondiente, pero también ha mediado en
problemas de tenencia de tierra, esto principalmente en su área de
Derechos Humanos.
 
Debido a este compromiso, con la historia, la justicia, la verdad y los
mas necesitados, la diócesis de San Marcos su Obispo sacerdotes, y
laicos miembros de la Pastoral Social han sido victimas de amenazas e
incluso allanamiento de instalaciones Diocesanas, ha esta innumerable
lista de hechos se suma ahora las amenazas que en su casa de habitación
sufrió el día 25 de junio el Lic. Mario Fernando Juárez Ávila, Asesor
legal del Programa de Derechos Humanos, y responsable del seguimiento en
los tribunales de diversos casos Laborales.
 
Adjuntamos a este correo el comunicado emitido por la Comisión Vocera de
la diócesis de San Marcos y pedimos a las organizaciones y personas
amigas, solidarizarse con la diócesis de San Marcos, pero principalmente
con el Lic. Mario Fernando Juárez Ávila, así como mostrar su repudio
ante estos hechos que enlutan el corazón del pueblo Guatemalteco.
 
Que hagan llegar sus llamados a los organismos que crean
correspondientes y que envíen una copia de estos llamados al proyecto
REMHI quienes lo haremos llegar a los compañeros del Programa de
Derechos Humanos de nuestra Diocesis.
 
con nuestra gratitud.
 
 
Víctor Lopez.
área de Proyectos
Proyecto REMHI
diócesis de San Marcos
10 av. 6-28 zona 4
Guatemala C.A.
E-mail remhiosm@itelgua,com
 velopezb@yahoo.com
 
------------------
 
COMUNICADO
 A LA COMUNIDAD NACIONAL E INTERNACIONAL, LA DIOCESIS DE SAN MARCOS
MANIFIESTA:
 Su profundo repudio y preocupación por los hechos ocurridos en la
residencia del Lic. Mario Fernando Juárez Ávila, asesor jurídico del
Programa de Derechos Humanos, el día miércoles veinticinco de junio del
presente año, a las nueve horas, cuando individuos simulando ser
electricistas se introdujeron con lujo de fuerza a dicha residencia,
portando armas de fuego de grueso calibre. Al estar en el interior de la
residencia pidieron que les entregaran dinero y documentación de los
procesos que el licenciado tramita, amenazando con dar muerte a la
esposa e hijo del licenciado y a la trabajadora doméstica.
 Después de apoderarse de la computadora y de un cheque por la cantidad
de Q. 18,000.00 que hicieron firmar a la esposa del licenciado
abandonaron la residencia con absoluta calma y seguridad, como quienes
saben que cuentan con total impunidad y libertad de acción, no sin antes
amenazar a la familia con regresar a darles muerte en caso que avisaran
del cheque al banco o a la policía. A pesar de dichas amenazas se dio
aviso de inmediato al banco respectivo, hecho que permitió la captura de
dos de los autores materiales, identificados ese mismo día, quienes se
encuentran detenidos.
 Es significativo que se llevaran únicamente la computadora y el cheque
antes mencionado, mientras que otros objetos de valor que se encontraban
en el mismo cuarto de la computadora y cuartos aledaños no fueron
tocados. Este hecho se suma a otros muchos en todo el país, y es un
indicador la inseguridad ciudadana que se vive en el país.
 POR TODO ELLO EXIGE:
1.Al Estado de Guatemala, que cumpla con su obligación de brindar
seguridad a la ciudadanía en general, de conformidad con el Artículo 1
y 2 de la Constitución Política de La Repúblicas de Guatemala, y en
especial a los defensores de los derechos humanos. Son ya demasiadas las
intimidaciones y agresiones que se han cometido y se siguen cometiendo,
bajo la más completa impunidad, durante el actual gobierno,
especialmente en contra de los defensores de derechos humanos y
representantes de medios de comunicación, como lo demuestra el grave
allanamiento de la casa del distinguido y muy digno periodista José
Rubén Zamora.
2.A la Policía Nacional Civil, que brinde la protección y seguridad que
el caso amerita al lic. Mario Juárez, esposa y familia, de acuerdo a la
Ley de Protección al Testigo, ( Decreto 70-96) ante las amenazas
proferidas por los hechores antes de abandonar la residencia.
 
3.Al Ministerio público, realizar la investigación minuciosa e inmediata
para encontrar a los autores intelectuales de este hecho delictivo,
apoyándose en la captura de dos de los autores materiales, para quienes
pedimos junto con los autores intelectuales, la completa aplicación de
las sanciones establecidas por la ley.
 Ante tales hechos nos solidarizamos con la familia Juárez Mérida y el
Programa de Derechos Humanos a quienes les expresamos nuestro fraternal
apoyo.
Manifestamos, asimismo, nuestra solidaridad al periodista José Rubén
Zamora ante los repudiables hechos de que fuera víctima él y su familia,
el 24 de los corrientes.
Una vez más, recordamos las palabras del Maestro: "LA VERDAD LOS HARA
LIBRES" (Juan 8, 32)
 
San Marcos de junio del 2003
 
 
COMISIÓN VOCERA DIÓCESIS DE SAN MARCOS

 

Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA)- OPPOSE IT NOW!


From: No CAFTA <cafta@cispes.org
Subject: Action alert: Negotiations for CAFTA Start, Call Congress and U.S. Trade Representative
Date: 09 Jan 2003 16:54:19 -0500


CAFTA NEGOTIATIONS OFFICIALLY OPENED ON JAN. 8th
ACT NOW! To Protect Human Rights

Official negotiations for the U.S-Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) were formally opened in a ceremony in Washington, DC on January 8th, 2003. Please contact your Representative, Senators, and the United States Trade Representative (USTR) and voice your opposition. A Sample letter and contact information are included below.

What is the U.S.- Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and why should we oppose it

The U.S.-Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) is a free trade agreement between the U.S. and the five Central American nations of Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica. Official negotiations for CAFTA opened between trade ministers of the six governments on January 8 and will continue once a month until December of 2003. The U.S. and Central American governments hope to have the treaty finished and ready for approval by the national legislatures of the six countries by the end of 2003.

CAFTA is an extension of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to include Central America and its implementation is seen key by the Bush administration and multinational corporations in obtaining the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), which would cover all the countries in the Western Hemisphere except Cuba. It will also help build the economic framework for Plan Puebla Panama (PPP), a 10-year long mega development project that will construct industrial infrastructure throughout the region. Civil society groups have protested the PPP because of the probable devastating impact that it will have on the environment, indigenous communities, and local economies.

Since President Bush announced his intention to implement CAFTA in January of 2002, very little public information has been released. The U.S. has released its objectives for the negotiations, but not its official negotiating positions. Public hearings were held in November of last year and a Congressional Oversight Group for CAFTA, FTAA, and other free trade agreements has been set up, but genuine input and participation in the negotiations by civil society groups in the U.S. and the five Central American countries is non-existent. At the same time, the U.S. Business Roundtable and financial elites in Central America have constant access to their government negotiation teams and trade ministers. The nine rounds of CAFTA negotiations will held in secret.

If adopted CAFTA would have the following consequences:

Privatization of Public Services:

A key component of free trade agreements is the privatization of public services. The logic of neoliberalism (corporate globalization) that drives these agreements sees government subsidies and support of public services such as water, education and healthcare as unfair "barriers" to trade and competition. However, privatization benefits only a tiny political and economic elite at the expense of the general public. Privatization has meant higher prices, poorer service, union busting, and worsened working conditions. Under CAFTA the state run health care, education, electrical generation, and water systems could be privatized and sold off to multinational corporations.

Increased Corporate Power, Erosion of Democracy, and Lack of Transparency:

Working hand-in-hand with privatization, free trade agreements like CAFTA would weaken regulatory measures and open the way for increased corporate exploitation in Central America and the U.S. The examples of Enron and WorldCom show how corporations in the United States use the deregulated "free" market to destroy lives in the name of profit. It is no coincidence that Enron - facing scandal in the US - is setting up shop in Nicaragua and other countries in the Global South. CAFTA would give companies free reign in Central America, obliterating the democratic process by robbing citizens of the power to shape their own destinies.

Additionally, CAFTA will most likely contain the Chapter 11 investor rights provision of NAFTA. This would allow foreign corporations to sue national governments for laws or regulations that were shown to have caused a loss in actual or even potential future profits. A secret tribunal whose members would be unknown to the public would hear such cases. Their rulings could not be appealed and would overrule existing local, state, and federal laws and international agreements on labor and human rights. Such elements of CAFTA would erode democracy and allow for decisions to be made behind closed doors that would affect the lives and well being of millions people. The U.S. is pushing NAFTA like investor state dispute mechanisms in the FTAA, so we can also anticipate these in CAFTA .

Destruction of agriculture and small farmers:

CAFTA would remove all tariff barriers the 5 Central American countries now have on imported agricultural products. This would allow cheaply grown and heavily subsidized U.S. corn and other basic grains to flood local markets. Small farmers in Central America, already devastated by the importation of cheaply grown U.S. basic grains, years of drought, and the massive fall of coffee prices on the world market, would face the extinction of their livelihoods. Under CAFTA millions would be forced to migrate to large urban areas to work in the informal sector or maquilas (sweatshops), or they would risk their lives in dangerous journey north to seek work in the U.S., facing a harsh anti-immigrant climate.

Weakening of laws protecting workers rights and the environment:

Laws protecting labor and human rights and the environment would be greatly weakened. The past few months have seen large-scale governmental assaults on public sector unions in El Salvador trying to stop the privatization of the electrical generating and public health care systems. Workers have been violently attacked by riot police and their rights under the Salvadoran labor code and constitution trampled upon in an attempt to bust their unions. In Guatemala union members, peasant organizers, and human rights activists face an increasing climate of government repression, including murder and kidnapping. Social movements and unions are also under attack in Honduras and Nicaragua.

Laws protecting labor and human rights in Central America could be overturned. Claims by the U.S. and Central American governments that workers rights will be respected and protected under CAFTA seem farcical given the current repression now occurring in the region.

Moreover, Central America is one of the most biologically diverse areas in the world, containing thousands of diverse and unique species of plants and animals. Laws protecting the environment could be gutted, declared as an impediment to the potential profits earned by foreign corporations. The corporations could then sue national governments under Chapter 11 provisions. Under NAFTA the Mexican state of San Luis Potosi was forced to accept a toxic waste site run by the U.S. Metalclad corporation. The Mexican federal government also had to pay the corporation $16 million in damages.

Social movements resist CAFTA:

Throughout Central America labor unions, peasant organizations, indigenous and women_s groups, and other social organizations are actively resisting CAFTA. On October 12, 2001 at least 40,000 people organized coordinated protests through the region, blocking key points of the Pan American highway and border crossings. Since October there have been 4 massive marches of at least 100,000 people each by social organizations in El Salvador protesting the attempt to privatize the public health care system. A Central American wide coalition of trade unions, peasant and indigenous organizations, women_s and environmental groups, and non-governmental organizations have joined together to fight CAFTA. They are struggling for their self-determination and to defend alternative models of social and economic development benefiting the majority of people in their countries and not multinational corporations.

Note: This piece incorporates previous materials on CAFTA created by the Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador.

Who to Contact:

Contact your Representative and Senators by fax, phone, or email. Let them know you oppose CAFTA.

To find out their contact information, visit the following sites or call the Capitol Switchboard at: 202-224-3121:
House of Representatives: http://clerk.house.gov/members/index.php
Senate: http://clerk.house.gov/members/index.php

You can also contact Daniel Fantozi, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) contact for Central America, at 202-395-5190 ext 8.

Sample Letter:

Dear

I am writing to express my profound concern of the U.S.-Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) negotiations, set to officially begin on January 8th.

With negotiations around the corner, no draft text of the negotiating strategies of any of the countries has been made available either to the countries_ Congress and National Assemblies or the general U.S. or Central American public. This utter lack of transparency offers little, if any, opportunity for meaningful public comment or input and minimal oversight by elected officials. Instead, wealthy transnational corporations, who stand to gain the most if CAFTA passes, are among the few who are given the opportunity to view draft texts and participate in negotiations. The millions whose quality of life, independence, health, economic stability, and traditions will be adversely affected have virtually no say in their own future.

CAFTA is essentially a continuation of the same policies put forward in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). While NAFTA offered promises of increased economic prosperity, it has instead wrought disastrous consequences for workers, small-scale farmers, and the environment. In fact, since it began in 1994, the percentage of the Mexican population living in poverty has risen from 58% to 79% and more than 700,000 decent paying jobs were lost in the U.S.

I strongly believe that CAFTA will only exacerbate poverty, environmental destruction, the loss of national sovereignty, and the unequal distribution of wealth and power. Additionally, the process of planning and negotiating CAFTA grossly violates the inherent principles of democracy and development.

Any trade agreement created with the countries in Central America must involve the real participation of all those affected by it, including civil society members. It must also fully accept that labor, environmental, and human rights are a precursor to true and equal development. CAFTA, along with any free trade agreement the U.S. government signs, must contain guaranteed and completely enforceable protections of environmental, labor, and human rights. I closely follow trade issues and will be in continued contact with you on this issue.


Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,


KEEP THE PRESSURE UP UNTIL JUSTICE IS SERVED!

For more information, contact the National Coalition Against CAFTA, at 212-465-8115 or via e-mail at cafta@cispes.org
You can also visit: www.cispes.org/cafta

Back to Top of Page